Third correction, and the load-bearing one. The previous commit put the
"did compaction clear the threshold?" verdict inside should_compress(). But
conversation_loop calls should_compress() TWICE per turn with two different
measures (turn_context.py / conversation_loop.py:1033 and :4789):
* pre-API : request_pressure_tokens -- a rough estimate that can dip BELOW
the threshold
* post-API: real prompt tokens -- which stay above it
So the rough reading reset the strike every turn and the loop never stopped.
Reproduced: 8 compactions in 8 turns under the real two-call pattern, even
with the previous fix applied. (My earlier repro only called should_compress()
once per turn, which is why it looked contained.)
Move the verdict to update_from_response(), the one place that sees the
provider's real prompt_tokens for the just-compacted conversation, guarded by
the existing awaiting_real_usage_after_compression flag so it fires exactly
once per compaction. Real-vs-real: it cannot be fooled by a rough sub-threshold
reading, and (from the previous commit's lesson) never subtracts an estimate
from a real count. should_compress() goes back to a plain threshold test plus
the pre-existing cooldown and anti-thrash guards.
New test test_rough_preflight_reading_does_not_reopen_the_loop drives the real
two-call-per-turn pattern and fails on the prior should_compress()-based commit.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
7f9485707d