* fix(tui_gateway): ask before queueing a guarded model picked mid-turn
config.set model on a running session cannot swap the agent in place, so it
stashes the pick in session["pending_model_switch"] and applies it at the
next turn start. That branch answered confirm_required=False without ever
running the selection guards.
A client that implements the confirm round-trip was therefore told no
consent was needed and never prompted. One turn later
_apply_pending_model_switch ran the guards with the stashed (unconfirmed)
flag, saw the warning, and dropped the switch by design. The model reverted
with no confirm ever offered, because the only moment a round-trip was
possible had already passed.
Evaluate the guards before stashing, where the client still has a live
response to turn into a prompt. Nothing is queued for an unconfirmed
guarded pick, so the session is left exactly as it was and the re-send
carrying confirm_expensive_model queues it for real. The apply-time check
stays as the backstop for guards that can only decide after resolution.
The data-policy guard keys on the model id alone, which is all this branch
can see before resolution. The cost guard returns None when pricing is
unknown and its models.dev lookup is allow_network=False, so calling it
early can only under-fire and never blocks the RPC thread.
* test(tui_gateway): pin provider forwarding, name the canonical confirm field
Two review follow-ups, no behavior change.
_pending_switch_selection_warning forwards `provider=provider or None`, but
nothing asserted it: a guarded model id fires the data-policy guard on the
model alone, so the existing tests passed with `provider` dropped entirely.
Record the kwargs instead. Dropping the argument fails the first test;
removing the `or None` normalization fails the second.
The confirm responses carry `warning` and `confirm_message` with identical
text, which reads like an accident. Name which one clients should read
(`confirm_message`; `warning` is the pre-confirm-era alias that
_apply_pending_model_switch already treats as a fallback) so the two do not
drift apart later.
Both raised by @Enough1122 in review.