Files
hermes-agent/tools/computer_use
teknium1 f9d6d04332 fix(computer-use): doctor and status report a configured cua-driver daemon whose serve is not listening
A hand-written Linux daemon unit (systemd user unit / XDG autostart entry
running `cua-driver serve`) can be dead for days — crash loop, stopped, never
started — while `hermes computer-use doctor` and `status` report a healthy
binary: the runtime contract only checks the binary (`manifest`), and nothing
ever connected to the daemon socket (#114748).

- tools/computer_use/cua_backend.py::cua_daemon_listening — socket-level
  liveness via `cua-driver status [--socket PATH]` (rc 0 = a daemon answered,
  "not running" = dead, anything else = unknown). Never raises.
- tools/computer_use/doctor.py::cua_daemon_units — one scan of the units that
  run cua-driver (kind, unit, exec target, runs `serve`, `--socket` path with
  `%h` expanded); the pruned-Exec guard now filters that list instead of
  re-scanning.
- doctor.py::_apply_daemon_liveness_guard — per `serve` unit: `pass` when its
  socket answers, `fail` (degrading `ok`) when not, with the hint that a driver
  reinstall does not start the daemon. Unconfigured daemons are never probed:
  on Linux the MCP runtime needs none, so a silent default socket is normal.
- `hermes computer-use status` prints the dead-daemon line and exits 1.
- docs: the Linux daemon-unit paragraph under the doctor section.

Not changed: _maybe_repair_runtime_contract. The repair is gated on the
binary-level contract only; a dead daemon never enters it, so a reinstall was
never triggered by the daemon (the `.release_installed/<version>` marker the
reporter saw is written by cua-driver itself on any first run of the binary —
observed via strace of `cua-driver status` under a fresh HOME).

Supersedes #114928 (@Finn763): same finding, ~600-line implementation with a
new module and a repair-gate rewrite; this is the ~90-line version on the
existing doctor seams.
2026-09-20 15:19:55 -07:00
..
…
…