Commit Graph

8 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Teknium
df81f543f8 fix(code-health): oversized-file fix text names the cheap way to comply
Files past 2,000 lines stay strictly no-growth (tests included). The message now says how
to offset growth in the same PR: move an existing function into a topical sibling (moved
code keeps its cap) or put new tests in a new test file. Probed on a 2,128-line file: plain
growth blocks; the same growth plus moving a CC-22 function out passes; a new test file
passes; growing the old test file blocks.
2026-10-04 21:29:39 -07:00
Teknium
baa07694a8 feat(code-health): heuristic rules warn until a frozen replay shows precision
HX001, HX003, HX010, HX012 and PS-P05/P06 now print as advisory findings instead of
blocking. Reviewers' samples put them between ~12% and ~60% precision, and the plan
ships weak rules as warnings first. Promote one by flipping it to blocking with replay
evidence in the PR. The ENFORCEMENT comment now says where the switch is read from.
Tests that used PS-P05 as a stand-in blocking violation now use a blind except.
2026-10-04 21:29:39 -07:00
Teknium
66cd3efacc fix(code-health): fix texts for HX010, HX001 and BLE001 say what is accepted
unsupportedpastels M4 (review 5408300628 §2.3) and m7: the printed fixes would
break code or did not match the engine.

- HX010 led with `is_truthy_value`, which returns False for every real key,
  while most hits are "is it set" checks (`bool(os.getenv("..._API_KEY"))`).
  It now offers `is not None` / `!= ""` for presence and `is_truthy_value`
  only for boolean flags.
- HX001 only said `get_hermes_home()`, which would move a path that lives
  under the user's home on purpose (the profiles root); such a path takes an
  allow with a reason.
- BLE001: the ratchet runs ruff with --ignore-noqa, so `# noqa: BLE001`
  waives nothing, and a message-only `logger.warning(..., e)` still fails.
  Verified with pinned ruff 0.15.10 through the real comparison path
  (test_ble001_fix_text_matches_the_engine): logger.exception, any log call
  with exc_info=True, and re-raise pass; `% e` logging and `# noqa` block;
  `# health: allow BLE001 -- why` waives.

Text only: no rule's blocking flag or ENFORCEMENT changed.
2026-10-04 21:29:39 -07:00
teknium1
6f0d25c1a1 feat(code-health): ENFORCEMENT switch and a pre-push hook
- `ENFORCEMENT` in scripts/code_health/config.py (blocking / advisory / off)
  turns the ratchet down or off with a one-line commit to main. It is read
  from the BASE revision, so it applies to fork PRs (repo variables are not
  passed to fork-triggered workflows), CI and local hooks alike, and a PR
  cannot relax its own check.
- `scripts/check --install-hook pre-push` judges each pushed commit the way
  CI judges the PR (base = that commit's merge-base); `--commit REV` is the
  underlying mode, `--uninstall-hook` removes our hooks and leaves foreign
  ones. Pre-commit and pre-push share one tree snapshot that never touches
  the user's worktree or index.
- A failing report names the local commands; CONTRIBUTING, AGENTS.md and the
  PR template point at `python scripts/check`.
2026-10-04 21:29:39 -07:00
teknium1
dd04dbedb1 fix(code-health): HX006 accepts proc.wait() right after proc.kill()
SIGKILL bounds a sync Popen.wait() that directly follows kill(), so it no
longer needs a timeout. communicate() after kill() and asyncio's
Process.wait() after kill() stay flagged: both read/close the pipes, and a
grandchild holding them blocks forever (measured: > 20 s with a background
`sleep`; the sync wait() returned in 0.00 s). The HX006 fix text now names
the reap pattern.
2026-10-04 21:29:39 -07:00
teknium1
cf0755f947 fix(code-health): occurrence provenance, alias-aware rules, strict file cap (round 4)
Fourth review round (F11-F18, N1-N4, kvnloo, Adolanium):

- Hits are old only where the base occurrence survives: a line the comment- and
  whitespace-blind line diff keeps (blame semantics), or anything inside a unit whose
  body is unchanged. An identical violation moved past unrelated code is new; removing
  an allow comment or re-indenting is not. Hit fingerprints exclude comments (N4).
- Inline allows cover their own line; only a comment-only line covers the next (N3).
- Rules read a copy of the AST with import aliases resolved, so `sp.run`,
  `from subprocess import run as execute`, aliased threading/asyncio/load_config are
  seen (F12); deadline helpers must resolve to the real asyncio API, and
  communicate()/wait() are judged only on receivers holding a spawned process (F13);
  infinite deadlines are unbounded (F14).
- HERMES_* writes introduce a name too (N1); bool(os.environ[...]) is HX010 (N2);
  HX009 needs the isinstance subject to come from gather(return_exceptions=True).
- Recursive self-references are normalised out of body hashes, so a recursive rename
  keeps its cap, py and ts (F15). Decorators belong to their function's scope and
  classes are matchable units, so their hits follow proven moves (F16).
- An over-cap file may not grow (F17, Teknium: strict improvement-only).
- A file the checker cannot parse or measure (ast/ruff/TS parse error) fails.
- scripts/check: --staged always lints an index snapshot (ignored files are invisible
  to git status, not to guards) (F18); create the --prefix dir for Git for Windows
  (F11); --only builds just the selected jobs, so it needs no ruff for non-ruff checks.
- CODEOWNERS covers scripts/check + scripts/code_health; frontend-only PRs skip the
  Python-only lint jobs again and run only the ratchet.
2026-10-04 21:29:39 -07:00
teknium1
add45e775e fix(code-health): hits follow proven moves only; stable TS identity; show advisories
Independent review of #132646 found five defects, each reproduced and fixed:

- Pattern hits from any vanished scope went into a shared (rule, text) pool, so deleting one
  `except Exception:` paid for an unrelated new one elsewhere, and class scopes (never units)
  always looked vanished. Hits now transfer only along a unit matched by body hash.
- A unit's prior is now looked up by body hash before qualname, so a TS anonymous callback
  whose source-order ordinal shifted keeps its cap.
- The TS body hash included the function name; it is now parameters + body, so a rename keeps
  its cap (as in Python).
- HX006 flagged `await asyncio.wait_for(proc.communicate(), timeout=...)`; calls passed to
  wait_for/timeout are bounded. The fix text now names the asyncio form.
- scripts/check printed output only on failure, hiding advisories and comment allows; the
  health report is now always shown.

Docs now say growth of a file already over 2,000 lines is a warning for now.
2026-10-04 21:29:39 -07:00
teknium1
4156715960 feat: code-health ratchet with per-unit caps for Python and TypeScript
scripts/code_health measures the files a change touches on both sides
(base revision and head) and fails when:
- a function or file over target grows past its own value on the base
  (CC 20, 300 own lines, nesting 6, file 2,000 lines);
- a new function or file is over target;
- a pattern rule gains a fingerprint (rule + enclosing function + line
  text), so fixing one violation never buys another.

Code that moves keeps its cap: functions match by name-independent body
hash, pattern hits by (rule, line text) once their function has left the
old place. Nested functions are their own units, so a closure edit never
counts against the hook or function around it. Python CC is ruff's C901
minus the direct nested defs; TypeScript is parsed with the lockfile's
typescript (no type check).

Rules: swallowed exceptions (S110, BLE001, E722), correctness (F821/F823/
F811/F841, RUF006), hangs (ASYNC230/240, S113, subprocess/urlopen without
timeout, sync config I/O in async def, get_event_loop, gather results
checked against Exception), profile scope (hardcoded ~/.hermes, a new
HERMES_* env var, UnscopedSecretError -> os.getenv, import-time capture,
raw threading.Thread, P05/P06 from profile_scope_patterns.json), argv
process identity, bool() of an env string, and if/elif ladders.

Growth of a file already over 2,000 lines is advisory: replaying 300
merged PRs, a blocking file-size ratchet would have stopped 46 of them
before the 119 over-target files are split. Everything else blocks; the
same replay finds 18 PRs that would have needed a change, every finding
a real hit for its rule.

No baseline file: base is measured on the fly, so an improvement that
lands on main is the new cap at once and parallel PRs never conflict on
ratchet state. `# health: allow <RULE> -- <why>` is the reviewed escape.
2026-10-04 21:29:39 -07:00